The
works of Guirguis George (paintings, mosaics, glassworks and murals)
are at once treats for the religious and secular eye as well as a
spiritual reunification of past and present. Drawn from the wellspring
which inspired the earliest Christian iconography, (2nd to 5th century
A. D.), itself a confluence of Egyptian, Hellenic (Greek) and Coptic
(Egyptian) Christian imagery, it suggests too what is most primal
and transcendent in modern Western art. This apparent anomaly is principally
an organic phenomenon; there is a poetic primitivism in Coptic iconography
that is less idiomatic than the more relaxed and elaborate Roman and
Eastern forms. This is a product of history, but also of the church's
insistence on the pure spiritual aspect of the incarnation of Jesus.
Undoubtedly influenced by the Gnosticism and Neo-Platonism that were
part of the Alexandrine intellectual template
The
Coptic Church saw Jesus Christ, human and Divine, as endowed with
a perfection which can only be an aspiration in mortal man. Engulfed
by this pristine cosmology, Mary was perceived as the bearer of God,
a holy vessel. This view was largely adopted by the Council of Nicaea
(325) organized by Constantine; a victory over Arius and the Arians.
Thus in Flaubert's Temptation of St. Anthony; Satan (disguised as
Anthony's disciple
Hilarion) slanders Athanasius in the following manner:
Hilarion: At the Council of Nicaea
He said speaking of Jesus:
"The man of the Lord."
Anthony:
Ah! That is blasphemy!
The Coptic
Church's purity of vision was challenged at the Council of Chalcedon
(451). There was a split and henceforth the Church would identify
itself as non-Chalcedonian. The Coptic Church would always be faithful
to its vision of Christ as an ultimately indivisible entity. But now
let us look at another continuity; the absorption of ancient Egyptian
visible culture.
Historians
familiar with the cult of Isis in Ancient Egypt, (then Greece and
Rome), suggest that the image of Isis, often depicted cradling her
infant child Horace, made natural the acceptance of Mary as the feminine
aspect of the one God. What is spiritual and only apparently human
must be depicted with caution and always with restraint.
|
|
|
|
Statuette
of Isis and Horus, 33030 B.C.E.;
Ptolemaic period
Egyptian (The Metropolitan Museum of Art)
|
Virgin breastfeeding Jesus
Dayr al-Suryan (Egypt), Church
of the Holy Virgin. Wall-painting:
|
This
aesthetic tendency carries over into depictions of inspired men (saints)
though they are clearly human and always placed below Jesus in the
Coptic iconic template. We will see below that this restrained aesthetic
was quite in harmony with the iconography of Ancient Egyptian religions.
The emphasis on Christ¹s Divinity, a compliment to the then current
philosophic argument that the soul was a precedent to the body, and
the visual and poetic culture which stems from it, is what most distinguishes
Copts from their Roman and Eastern brethren.
The immediacy, the "presentness," of this Neo-Coptic art
to us is further explained by a more recent phenomenon, the slow but
steady emergence of the Coptic community and its artists from twelve
centuries of imposed isolation from the larger world. Neo-Coptic artists
are now confronting in a dynamic way the culture and art that prevails
in the West. Restraint is not constraint; there is a developmental
aspect to this ancient form. While the icons show restraint, even
rigidity, the artist himself has some freedom within the form to infuse
it with his own individuality.
Now centered in Cairo, the Coptic culture was born in the once intellectually,
culturally and theologically vital Hellenic city of Alexandria. That
Mediterranean harbor thrived from its founding in 332 B.C. until 643
A.D. It was then that the great ancient city fell from the heights
of Western and Near-Eastern culture into a hidden crevice of the Islamic
world. A Tall amphora became a cracked urn. For centuries amidst the
paroxysms of the Greek and Roman worlds, even with the rise of Constantinople,
Alexandria with its boisterous clerics, theologians and teachers was
at the pinnacle of the emerging Christian world. It was here amidst
currents of Pagan philosophy, Arianism, Neo-Platonism, Gnosticism,
Mithraism, Judaism, and the enduring presence of Egyptian, Greek and
Roman pantheons that Christianity first thrived. Christians themselves
were an integral part of the intellectual mix. As Synesius tells us
after a disappointing trip to Athens, "it is in Egypt now that
Philosophy flourishes." It was a ripe field for evangelism.
It was
in Alexandria, the see of St. Mark, that the Athenian Clement taught
Christianity in a way most attractive to the Hellenized mind. It was
here that Origen battled Celsus over doctrine and that the Hermitic
movement was born. It was here that St. Cyril battled against the
revitalized Hellenistic paganism of the brilliant, beautiful, ill-fated
Hypatia and stood victorious against Nestorius over the soul of the
Church. His victory was not total but vital and enduring. It was here
that Synesius of Cyrene, a student of Hypatia, became the embodiment
of the transition from philosophic paganism to Christianity so emblematic
of the Alexandrine experience. Synesius, an intellectual who would
write some of the most enduring and beautiful hymns to Christ. Herodas
wrote of Alexandria that it was, "the house of Aphrodite, and
everything is to be found there - wealth, playgrounds, a large army,
a serene sky, public displays, philosophers, precious metals, fine
young men, a good royal house, an academy of science, exquisite wines
and beautiful women."
St. Anthony
passed through here and was tempted to return. He had removed himself
from the world, a world encapsulated in this Egyptian cauldron. Flaubert
has him imagining it thus:
"Strolling
peddlers, porters, ass-drivers run and jostle together. Here and
there one observes some priest of Osiris wearing a panther skin
on his shoulders, a Roman soldier with his bronze helmet, and many
Negroes. At the threshold of the shops women pause, artisans ply
their trades; and the grinding noise of chariot wheels puts to flight
the birds that devour the detritus of the butcher shops and the
morsels of fish left upon the ground."
The
general outline of the streets seems like a black network flung upon
the white uniformity of the houses. The markets stocked with herbs
make green bouquets in the midst of it; the drying yards of the dyers,
blotches of color; the golden ornaments of the temple-pediments, luminous
points all comprised within the oval enclosure of the grey ramparts,
under the vault of the blue heaven, beside the motionless sea.
What
magic it would have been to be a young man or woman tilling the wonders
of a city at its azimuth. But As Charles Peguy wrote, "History
does not go where one would wish. History goes where it wishes."
Alexandria,Overwhelmed by Islam,largely because of its lively and
eclectic atmosphere, was chastened and then ignored for centuries.
The influence of Alexandria's Christians on the universal church subsided
and eventually became vestigial. Now all eyes turned to Rome and Constantinople.
Islam,
like Judaism and Christianity was an alternative to the paganism of
the West and Near East, but in its zeal made no distinction between
pagan representations, the foci of devotion and ritual, and spiritual
imagery. This led some Moslems to periodically destroy Coptic works
of art. Such choleric purity is at the best unfriendly to other beliefs
and the representations of those beliefs.
The survival
of the Coptic Church and even more its visual culture is a marvel
of history and a testament to faith. The Copts became a minority,
but despite recurring sequences of toleration and persecution they
survived and are with us today. It is likely that the extreme devotion
that comes of separation kept the Church in place, respectful of the
Ancient Egyptian and Hellenic elements of its art and other ties to
its history. To a certain extent time stood still. The works represented
here are apparitions ancient and contemporary. Alexandria, the Nile,
the hills of Judea, Akademos and the Tiber -- they are all here for
the discerning eye.
That
there should be such a convergence of thought and culture is not unexpected;
it is a common theme in cultural anthropology, general history and
art history, but it does not happen by itself. Men make history. There
is a vast historiography devoted to the emergence of Christianity
and its dynamic correspondence to philosophy, rhetoric and paganism.
Historians of Ancient times, religion and art confront what Arnold
Toynbee called, "the schism of the soul," and the eventual
reintegration of that soul based on new beliefs and realities.
This
dynamic was natural, but many of the Fathers of Christianity were
very aware of the force of tradition and cleverly drew from the heterodoxy
to instill their new orthodoxy in the minds and hearts of those they
were trying to bring into the flock. Though others tried, for example
Philo the Alexandrian Jew, it was the Christian leadership that was
most successful at absorbing philosophy and paganism into their faith.
We spoke of Synesius above. His eclectic background gave his words
a unique potency, but he was just one of many. An Italian historian
of early Christianity, Arnaldo Momigliano, writes:
"The church attracted the
most creative minds-St. Ambrose, St. Jerome, Hilarius of Poitiers,
St. Augustine in the West; Athanasius, John Chrysostom, Gregory
of Nazianzus, and Basil of Caesarea in the East. Almost all born
rulers, rulers of a type which, with the exception of the scholarly
emperor Julian, it was hard to find on the imperial throne. They
combined Christian theology with pagan philosophy, worldly political
abilities with a secure faith in immortal values. They could tell
both the learned and the unlearned how they should behave, and consequently
transformed both the external features and the inner meaning of
the daily existence of an increasing number of people."
It is
in precisely this manner, though we cannot swear to the political
acumen of the artist, that the external feature of existence that
we call art was also transformed. Though some might argue about degree,
there is no doubt that Coptic art emerged from the Egyptian and Egypto-Hellenic
visual culture that surrounded the first Christian artists of Egypt.
In some
instances we can see this expressed explicitly in content. In most
cases the correspondence is less explicit and more a matter of form
and affect. This is only natural in that the actual content being
depicted was different. The most often noted evidence of pure Egyptian
influence is the similarity between the Coptic depiction of the Cross
and the symbol of life, the 'Ankh' ( ). In fact, in early relief slabs
one can see joined together the Christian Cross, the Ankh and the
Greek letters, Alpha (a) and Omega (w).
We discussed
above the significance, as a transitional object, to Coptic Art and
theology of the widespread cult of Isis, especially the mother/son
imagery. It so happens that the ancient trinity of Isis, Osiris and
Horace reached its peak of popularity as Rome was teetering and Christianity
was ascendant. Hellenistic philosophies which seemed to engender captiousness
were becoming effectively moribund despite their intrinsic worth.
In the troubled times that befell the Empire from the second century
onward, mystery religions and magic were more comforting than the
more complicated Athenian chatter; as too was the warm and beckoning
embrace of Christianity. It is of no surprise to us that aesthetically
pleasing and comforting deities should find their essences in the
matrix of Coptic art.
|
|
|
|
|
Textile
with Erotes figures in a boat
From
Akhmim, Egypt
Hellenistic period, 305-30 BC
Fragment
of linen, decorated in
multi-coloured wool loops
The
British Museum
|
Tapestry
with Fish Antinoé
2nd-3rd
century AD
the
Louvre Museum
|
Textile
with figure
The
Coptic Museum
|
Eventually
Coptic tapestry would depict the usual prophets and saints, but in
the earliest years one was more likely to find the Hare or the Lion.
The funerary cult of Osiris played a large part in woven imagery.
The ivy, grape vine and wine filled amphorae, a Greek contribution,
associated with the cult are ubiquitous. The Osiris connection does
not end here. We notice in Coptic figures of Christ and the Saints
a restrained, even rigid, mien. This is clearly an emulation of depictions
of Pharaohs and their Queens who are portrayed in a way that suggests
that they are uncomfortably corseted. Interestingly, as Egyptian monarchs
are portrayed with Mona Lisa-like grins even in death, the face of
Christ in Coptic imagery, though more stoic, does not show suffering;
this would be all too human. We are not to behold a man but to imagine
God. In death the rigidity of the Pharaohs is greater; they are bundled,
mummified. Here comes Osiris, now as Serapis, back into the picture.
Like his companion deity in death, the deceased King prepares for
afterlife by crossing his arms over the breast. Coptic figures are
often portrayed in just this way. And so we can see in an image of
Jesus or of a particular Saint or Prophet an image of Osiris.
In other Coptic figures the arms are held down stiffly along the sides.
This stance is common in Egyptian figures as well as in many archaic
Greek statues. Here then is both an Egyptian and Greek influence.
We are continually reminded of the diffusion of culture in the ancient
world.
Space
does not allow a full inquiry. Suffice it to say that there are many
more examples that can be cited. What is important to note is that,
as discussed above, history and context; the prolonged isolation of
the Coptic Church and thus its more immediate connection to the distant
past as well as the necessary restraint implicit in the view of Jesus
as equally God and Man keeps alive not only the Christian past, but
the spirit of ancient Egypt and to a lesser extent Hellenic culture.
Such is the truth behind this most archaic Christian iconography.
What we described above as poetic primitivism in art is reinforced
by history and faith.
|
|
|
|
A
TRIAD OF MENKAURE
Egyptian
Museum
|
Amenophis
IV -
Akhenaton
1369-1332
BC
|
Saint
Barsoum
| 36" x 24" |
Egg Tempera on wood
panel with gold leaf
by Guirguis
T George
|
We return
then to Neo-Coptic Art and specifically the art of Guirguis George.
The austere Coptic iconography reaches out to us without complex mannerism
and so reaches directly and tenderly into our souls. Little annotation
is necessary. We understand and feel immediately. When rarefied, as
it is by Mr. George, the experience becomes more sublime. There is
much difference, but we find in some of these pieces a spirit suggestive
of Marc Chagall or even Wassily Kandinsky. This art transcends dogma
and does so without effort. It might be useful at this point to recall
the words of Kandinsky:
"To
paint is to detonate a shock of different worlds
In terms
of technique, each work comes into existence as the Cosmos did,
by means of catastrophes that, beginning with the chaotic cries
of the instruments, finish in the sympathy we call the music of
the spheres."
As we
come to the end of this discussion let us not forget that we have
traveled into the past only to arrive at the present; and all while
being still. The arts and history have the potential for such magic.
In his brilliant essay on History, Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote:
"All
inquiry regarding the pyramids, the excavated cities, Stonehenge,
the Ohio Circles, Mexico, Memphis, -- is the desire to do away with
this wild, savage, and preposterous There and Then and introduce
in its place the here and now. Belzoni digs and measures the mummy
pits and pyramids of Thebes, until he can see the end of the difference
between the monstrous work and himself, in general and in detail,
that it was made by such a person as he, so armed and so motivated,
and to ends to which he himself should also have worked, the problem
is solved; his thought lives along the whole line of temples and
sphinxes and catacombs, passes through them all with satisfaction,
and they live again to the mind, or are now."
|